Jump to content

Talk:Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
==WP Tax Class==

Pretty detailed article and covers what's important, should go to a B class article at least. With references and expansion could go to Good Article or higher.EECavazos 02:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs work, but it is much more than a stub. Mpublius 13:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the first comment in the WP Tax Class section. The article is not classed as a stub and the reasons are given why. Perhaps you can take the initiative.EECavazos 18:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't mention that certain non-profits organizations (namely, educational and charitable ones) were exempt from the flat tax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.202.28 (talk) 06:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==WP Tax Priority==

Low priority because about a past law.EECavazos 02:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Unsupported statements

[edit]

All through this page are assertions that are not supported by cited sources 2600:387:F:5730:0:0:0:6 (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]