Talk:White Rose Centre
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Location
[edit]I reverted the change to Leeds again, the references supplied are just to postal addesses which will just show Leeds, specifically it is in the City of Leeds rather than Leeds. If you think it is in Churwell then place that in the article rather than Morley, it needs something more specific than Leeds. Keith D (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- The location in article says "Beeston area of the City of Leeds", but the Beeston article says that Beeston is "a suburb of Leeds" while the website of the WRC states that it's "in south Leeds". 10 October 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.133.211 (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Where are the references in this article? I'm sure there are lot of social issues on the centre's role in the community that could be mentioned here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LarkinToad2010 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on White Rose Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110715083723/http://www.pilkingtons.com/pilk/index.php?page=studywhiterose to http://www.pilkingtons.com/pilk/index.php?page=studywhiterose
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:White Rose Centre/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 14:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on White Rose Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004025537/http://www.white-rose.co.uk/getting-here/map to http://white-rose.co.uk/getting-here/map
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)