Talk:Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen, BWV 12

Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen, BWV 12 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 16, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 29, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the 1714 Bach cantata Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen, BWV 12, the first choral section was described as a "tombeau ... most impressive and deeply affecting"?

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Weinen, Klagen, Sorgen, Zagen, BWV 12/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will review within the next three days :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

pipe Schlosskirche in Weimar to Schloss Weimar.

It's intentionally to the redirect, because some day thatcould become an article.

Lead

A lot of italics. It is really necessary to italicize positions like Konzertmeister and Thomaskantor?

Copied from FA BWV 172, that's my model.

History

" The text of the opening chorus corresponds to John 16:20, the text of the first recitative is taken from Acts 14:22, "we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God". = "The text of the opening chorus corresponds to John 16:20, and the text of the first recitative, "we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God", is taken from Acts 14:22."

taken

Music

A lot of very short paragraphs and quite a lot of short, snappy sentences. Can you merge a few?

This still reads as a bit rough around the edges in parts. Could use a copyedit for clarity and some tidying up in parts but in terms of content looks adequate for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, but make a few days. rather busy today and tomorrow, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Good job Gerda, looks fine for GA now!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]