Talk:War of the Three Henries (976–978)

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Medieval Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chiefest

I hate to be this nitpicky, but why was "chiefest" changed to "chief"? Srnec 18:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Henries"

Why isn't this article named "War of the Three Henrys (977–978)"? Proper nouns ending in y form their plural by simply adding an s, rather than changing y to ies. See also http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Inductance#What_is_the_plural_of_a_Henry.3F — 217.46.147.13 (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason this should be so. Think about it: if a proper noun is really proper, then it can never be pluralised. The moment we pluralise it we are creating a bastard, so it really doesn't matter much either way. Is Greeces the plural of Greece? Is the plural of Germany Germanies? In fact, for the latter, it is and has been used, which is evidence that pluralisation of words that are proper nouns in other contexts follows the same rules of pluralisation as any common nouns. Srnec (talk) 05:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]