Talk:Wagga Wagga

Wagga Wagga was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 26, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
September 25, 2007	Good article reassessment	Kept
January 30, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Australia: New South Wales / Riverina Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wagga Wagga is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Riverina (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Wagga Wagga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary not understandable

I cannot understand the edit summary, accompanying this recent deletion, which says ["https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wagga_Wagga&action=history Questionable, nothing historic proving it"]. Nor does the deletion appear sensible. --2604:2000:E016:A700:83C:9D69:6EEB:19BE (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wagga Wagga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907002534/http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/dlg_CouncilContactDetails.asp?slacode=7750 to http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/dlg_CouncilContactDetails.asp?slacode=7750
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oasiswaggawagga.com.au/oasis/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people

hi, i have just removed everything from the Wagga Wagga#Notable people section to keep it WP:NPOV, they should only be listed at List of people from Wagga Wagga (i have added a couple of people that werent already included there). will hopefully be editing/improving(?:)) that list over the next few days. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the above. The current list is heavy with rugby league players of questionable notability (their significance is not summarised at all), while there are numerous Australian rules footballers of equal or greater notability left off the main page. --Rulesfan (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2WG sign

Being only an occasional visitor to Wagga, I was quite pleased when the historical neon sign over the building at the south end of Fitzmaurice street was brought back to life. So recently, when staying in town overnight, I took a few pictures with the intention of adding them to this site. I added one composite (more later) photo to Commons, thence to this article. The picture was removed by User:Bidgee on the grounds that it was too dark (agreed, but not a hanging offence) and that 2WG no longer used the building (not implied). But taking his critique to heart, I replaced the picture with one I took later at a slower shutter speed. The same User, whose many superb shots in this article attest to the fact that he is a photographer of considerable ability, promptly removed that version on the grounds that the sky was "blown out", and the neons looked fake. If "blown out" means overexposed — True, but that's the price you pay for brightening up the building. As for the fake neons . . . yes. The picture is a composite of two photographs from the same spot, the second taken at night and (digitally) laid over the other. It could not be any other way if the tubes' colours are to be seen (the sign is not activated until dark). The final charge, that it's historical and not related to media, I can't answer. I'm not going to revert but someone else might. Doug butler (talk) 06:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to give constructive criticism. A building that was use by a radio station over two decades ago and a call sign that is no longer in use. The media section doesn't go into the history. Also there are issues with the quality, neon is always is hard to photograph but is possible. Bidgee (talk) 11:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is not constructive criticism. I was trying to capture a very interesting local artefact and reckon it was successful. I've seen a very good nighttime picture celebrating the switch-on; most attractive but not as informative. Doug butler (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

Wagga Wagga

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A GA from 2007. There's lots of uncited material that needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.