Talk:Vani Bhojan

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Vani Bhojan.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Why does the picture keep getting removed?

EGL1234 (talk) 12:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a copyrighted picture, taken from https://www.filmibeat.com/celebs/vani-bhojan.html . Wikipedia has to take copyright issues very seriously. --bonadea contributions talk 12:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Vani Bhojan2.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

@Riya Iyer S Menon and Eswnav: If you two don't start discussing the changes you both are making, you're both going to wind up blocked for edit-warring. Consensus is determined through discussion, not through edit reversions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: - Sorry if i have done anything wrong.But I just filtered out the Unwanted decorating things,even for simple content than User Eswnav is provided to Vani Bhojan article.When we look back previous old to new edit history of User Eswnav,He keep branding her daily and continuosly.He revised my edit versions always and continuosly without the reason behind why i removed or re-edited in a good brief way.He keeps branding her...This is not a Planform to brand her or any of her's fans.Vani is young talent and not have so experience as several other actresses.I made a good edits on her's briefly .Removed wild content of Informations with a good language in accurate and brief way.Not only here but also for some other artcles too..

The reasons and following problems are mentioned below why User Eswnav is after her page,even for a simple & minute thing,With continuous focus on her only..
Dedication and Fan admiration is good But here is not a place to Brand any of those favourite Actors or Actresses.What an article reQuires is enough
You are still seeking multilple no.of Images of Vani Bhojan to different editors like Veera Narayana & others including me.
You only added Actress Vani Bhojan's name and details among List of Indian television actresses .you even added her image multiple times.Why couldn't you add other famous and veteran Serial actresses from South India????????,Also when i added South Indian artists names and images in the same article you just removed all those ones.List of Indian Television doesn't mean North Indian Hindi actresses only.It also includes south indian actresses from Malayalam,Tamil etc...
Even you mentioned my name over several pages without understanding why i cleared out unnecessary contents.
Also you keeps removing what relevant content am providing for some articles with significance, for silly reasons.. as a revenge ?????Veteran actresses are more popular and experienced than young generation's actresess..you just replaced young actresses in place of veteran actresses in article List of Indian film actresses.
You only branding Actress Vani Bhojan in some artciles like List of Indian Television / Serial Actresses , Oh My Kadavule Movie ,etc..

I Edited it in a very neat and short way.You expanded her article, mostly with unwanted and unecessary things.Try to Understand it.he is a mad Fan of her's.Even Kailash29792 agrees with me on my Edits.Even i mentioned those points,he keeps doing the same.Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a mad fan of Vani Bhojan, I editing Vani Bhojan article page for she acted well in television and some movies and also I editing all the actresses of Kollywood. In Vani Bhojan career Riya Iyer S Menon you edit Very very short but I edit correctly explained. Eswnav (talk) 03:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is what you two should be talking about:

@Riya Iyer S Menon: in this edit you removed content from the lede that described her cinematic debut. Why? Doesn't that seem like something that should be indicated in the lede? The lede is supposed to summarise the most important facts about the subject.
Riya, in the same edits you removed content about her early commercial work, which turned into model work. Why?
In the same edit you removed content about N4. Is that because it never came to fruition?

This is how the two of you need to start communicating. There's also an additional issue, which is that neither of you seems very strong in English. We can't have lots of typographical/grammatical or formatting errors introduced into the article. Please both be more careful about this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Career

Please don't edit Vani Bhojan career, that is correct. Eswnav (talk) 09:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eswnav: No, you cannot tell other editors not to edit an article, nor can you decide what is "correct" when you haven't discussed the issues and reached a consensus about them. If you read the section above you will see the kind of arguments that are constructive. --bonadea contributions talk 10:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Vani Bhojan02.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitive content in both Filmography and career, unnecessary pics

Career section simply repeats what's better presented in Filmography table. Minor roles do not need elaboration. Plus the article is about her; it doesn't need to list all the actors she played against in each film. And there are too many pics - two of them are from the same event too. My edits have been reverted by IPs and this is an attempt to engage. Can the reverters please respond why low-quality content needs to stay? Hemanthah (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Carrer means what she done after entered into the tele and film industry. That's why I briefly explain so kindly don't change sir please. You said again and again repeating the movie now I changed. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6292:8D28:CDC8:138F:A121:3A75 (talk) 14:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2409:4072:6292:8D28:CDC8:138F:A121:3A75 You've changed nothing and made no attempt to explain anything here. What is the relevance of the quotes? Why are two photos in very similar pose needed? Why should content in Filmography be repeated in prose form? --Hemanthah (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

rasmika mandana article go and see, her career. She came to industry now but Vani Bhojan came 10 years back. So kindly expand the Bhojan career. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:6292:8D28:F19A:4E9F:413D:938F (talk) 05:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That article is also a mess as indicated by the tag at the top. Discussing other articles here isn't productive. The wide range of IPs makes me a bit suspicious about the intentions here so I'm not going to engage any more non-specific replies. --Hemanthah (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]