Talk:Up in Smoke Tour
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Somebody that can actually write in the English language needs to re-write this page. It makes me want to cry.
- Agreed. It's on my to-do list. Riana ⁂ 20:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Listen, I spent time on this article, you may not like it, but then improve it, instead of just deleting the half of it.
- Waitingfordresdetox (creator of the page)
- I Just read your userpage, Riana, your hobbies are chemistry, singing in a choir, and your from Australia, What is a person like you cryin' about a westcoast hardcore hiphop page??
- So a person can't improve an article if it has horrid English? I'm a hip-hop fan, and I think she has every right to try and fix any grammatical errors she sees. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 19:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- She has every right to improve my grammar, cause that's not my best point, but the only thing ya'll do is deleting the most of my article. My grammar is good enough to know improve is something different as deleting. And by the way, most of my information comes from the interview on the DVD, and for example the Detroit Incedent was something they were telling, using that words and sentences on the DVD.
- Waitingfordresdetox
- So a person can't improve an article if it has horrid English? I'm a hip-hop fan, and I think she has every right to try and fix any grammatical errors she sees. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 19:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- I Just read your userpage, Riana, your hobbies are chemistry, singing in a choir, and your from Australia, What is a person like you cryin' about a westcoast hardcore hiphop page??
Fair use rationale for Image:Notoriousbi bornagain 101b.jpg
[edit]Image:Notoriousbi bornagain 101b.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:War+peace.jpg
[edit]Image:War+peace.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Article approach
[edit]This article needs to reference teh DVD more and the tour less. Obviously it will mention the tour, but it should be from the aspect of the DVD.--Esprit15d( • ۞ • ▲) 13:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I completely disagree. The article should maybe briefly mention the DVD, which is only notable because it is a DVD of the tour. The DVD could really not be mentioned at all.--24.90.14.214 (talk) 07:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Tour's success and incidents with police
[edit]Both need to be explored in article.--24.90.14.214 (talk) 07:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)