This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Alieta Eck is definitely NOT a John Birch Society speaker, which implies that she speaks on behalf of the John Birch Society, which I see no evidence. The John Birch Society does promote her health care reform views. However, other organizations also promote her health care reform views. She is NOT their speaker either. Any political involvement appears to be solely as a health care reform advocate, as evidenced by the many papers and presentations that she has made on health care reform. In your cited US News & World Report article, I would not consider the author to be a reliable, neutral source, since he appears to over promote Lonegan and denigrate, diminish, and try to find Alieta Eck guilty by association when he mentions her "experience in politics seems not to go much beyond this speech to the extremist John Birch Society". That derogatory characterization of Eck is simply not complete or representative of her efforts since she has focused her health care reform efforts in a variety of different political forums outside of the John Birch Society.
I propose to updated the info for Alieta Eck as noted below.
It would include citation links, which are currently shown with this statement in the current article. It would also include the 2 links below regarding a portrayal as a health care reform advocate. It includes one of your references to a health care reform presentation that was sponsored by John Birch Society. I would delete the US News and World Report Article since it does not appear to be a neutral source.