Talk:United States Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps

RADM James E. McPherson retired earlier this year - the current JAG of the Navy is RADM Bruce E. MacDonald, JAGC, USN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.14.190 (talk) 23:37, 13 October 2006 UTC)

Rank of Judge Advocates General

I made the list of JAGs a sublist (using three equal signs). In the article, it states that Judge Advocates General are either a three-star Vice Admiral or a Lt. General, depending on whether or not s/he is a Naval officer or a Marine; and Deputy Judge Advocates General are two-star Rear Admirals (or, if a Marine, a major general). Yet, the list of Judge Advocates General are all, from 1918 onwards, Rear Admirals. Yet, according to the paragraph leading to the list, Rear Admirals are the rank conferred upon DJAGs, not JAGs. How about a clarification? —Micahbrwn (talk) 05:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The corresponding rank to the position of the Judge Advocate Generals was "upgraded" just in 2008. From now on (the incumbents will be promoted) the several JAGs have Three-stars. --GrummelJS (talk) 09:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

First off, the pluralization is Judge Advocates General, not Judge Advocate Generals, just as the pluralization of "Surgeon General" is Surgeons General." Secondly, I still don't understand. So you're saying that JAGs are "really" two-stars, as are DJAGs? —MicahBrwn (talk) 01:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Beside the Plural question in which i don't agree, it is as i wrote it. Until 2008 JAG and DJAG were Rear Admirals (u.h.) and after changing this is 2008 the future JAG will be a Vice Admiral and the future DJAG will be Rear Admiral (u.h.). --GrummelJS (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430092234/http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/5148%28b%29.html to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/5148%28b%29.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)