Talk:Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 3 months

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Presidents Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

article about the final report?

Just curious if anyone is thinking about working on a new article to cover whatever is said about the final report? I guess it might be a while before there is any in-depth coverage that we could work from, though ... and I wonder if the New York Times or Washington Post will release anything good enough that would allow us to do a decent job of summarizing its contents? It wouldn't make sense to just cite random articles about this minor thing or that minor thing. Without doing WP:OR and quoting extensively from the report itself, I wonder how it could be done, or if this is worth doing at all? Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should follow the Mueller report model eventually, but as you say, we need RS to digest all of this first. soibangla (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

random links to be integrated into article

I just trimmed the External Links section to URLs that generally talk about the subject, also removing dated links. The rest of the non-general links are posted below, and may be useful to integrate into the body of the article-Classicfilms (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prepared statement of J. Michael Luttig, June 16, 2022
Fake alternate slates of Trump electors for seven states — obtained by FOIA request
"Read the full transcript and listen to Trump's audio call with Georgia secretary of state". CNN. January 4, 2021.
"Read the Unsent Letter by Jeffrey Clark to Georgia Officials". The New York Times. June 23, 2022. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022.
Video (18:49): "Inside Trump's Election Plot" on YouTube (MSNBC News; July 29, 2022)
"Donald Trump Is Not Above The Law" (The New York Times; August 26, 2022)
The Devastating New History of the January 6th Insurrection: The House report describes both a catastrophe and a way forward ― The New Yorker. December 22, 2022

Classicfilms (talk) 23:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]