A fact from Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (Mountain View, California) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Apparently there is a low-speed 120x80 wind tunnel at Nasa Ames, but this article doesn't seem to mention it. I have a photo (as I'm sure is easily got, since I only drove past as a fluke) Karora11:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tag in article indicates it is based on a NPS webpage that is "public domain". I assume that as is the case for similar articles with similar tags, that means material in this article is cut and pasted, constituting plagiarism but not copyright violation. I tagged article with "refimprove" and downrate to Stub for now. Please improve the article by comparing carefully to source webpage, removing or quoting all copied phrases, so that removal of the NPS tag is justified. Of course, if it is copied, having the NPS tag acknowledging that is better than asserting, implicitly, that the article does not include copied material. It would be reasonable for an editor to blank the article and start over, IMHO, too, but editing the article to improve it would be better. doncram (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Editor Kudzuvine has created new articles on several other wind tunnels that are NHLs in Virginia. I am now going to heavily rework this page, per comments above, and invite Kudzuvine's assistance. doncram (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]