Talk:USS Mission Bay
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:USS Mission Bay (CVE-59))
![]() | USS Mission Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 6, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Mission Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 02:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Really nice article expansion there, kind of like what I did with submarines some time ago. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Image review
[edit]- Images look fine. Even if the uplaoder of File:CVE59 Mission Bay 1.jpg didn't own the copyright, its PD because it was taken by the US Navy.
Source review
[edit]- All sources look reliable, except for https://www.hazegray.org/ . I've never been really good at determining the reliability of online references, but I have some doubts about it. I think most if not all of the info found there could sourced by other sources.
- Most of the information within hazegray is mirrored in the other sources. I suppose it's rather redundant.
Lead
[edit]- I really think that the lead could be expanded at least a few lines with more details of her wartime career. I'll re-review afterwards.
Design
[edit]- link stern
- This section looks good except that I would suggest changing the caption of the image from "A profile of the design of Takanis Bay, which was shared with all Casablanca-class escort carriers" to something like "Profile of a Casablanca-class escort carrier".
Construction
[edit]- remove the redlink for the captain, I really don't think he would be notable or that anyone would write an article on him.
Career
[edit]- rm the William Ellis Gentner redlink
- link mothballed to Reserve fleet.
- The rest looks good.
GA Progress
[edit]Good Article review progress box
|
- @L293d: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 04:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- @L293D: Reping. Stikkyy t/c 04:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Good work. The lead still needs some more content though. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- @L293D: I've added a bit more. Stikkyy t/c 07:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Great work, closing as promoted. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages