Jump to content

Talk:Two-minute silence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Two minute silence)

Unbalanced article

[edit]

There are plenty of reliable sources for the idea originating from both Sir Percy Fitzpatrick and Edward George Honey (and one even suggesting Fitzpatrick passed Honey's idea on). This article should not be solely focused on one point of view, it is unbalanced as it stands as is the Edward George Honey article. Wikipedia is not supposed to take sides or have conflicting information in different articles. HelenOnline 10:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HelenOnline: Alas the problem still exists! Having come upon it 'independently' from you.220 of Borg 01:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
While the BBC claims that the idea actually came from a Robert Rutherford Brydone, who isn't even mentioned in the article. -Droigheann (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Found and added what seems like reliable information about Brydone, which appears to be corroborated in several versions of the story. Unless something concrete in an original source can be found to make a direct link between Honey and Fitzpatrick, it seems much less likely that his letter to the newspaper was a major driver for the establishment of this tradition. Sir Percy would have been very familiar with the silence practised in Cape Town on a daily basis for that last year of the war.Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://salegion.co.za/two-minutes-silence.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lucas559 (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good source to include and cite. But it must be paraphrased and cited properly (facebook!).--Lucas559 (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has significant overlap with some of the pages mentioned in the "See also" list and could do with some tidying up across all of them.Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now mostly cleaned up, but will review over time. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]