This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
With the exception of the seventh letter, these aren't really very notable works, whether or not Plato really wrote them (and he likely didn't...). They are also very short and there's been little criticism on any of them that really stands independent of the collection as a whole. As such, there's really not much to write on any of them that wouldn't just be a summary or a paraphrase of a work that is itself a very short paragraph. I'm going to merge them all back in except the Seventh Letter. - car chasm (talk) 01:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it seems like pretty much every classical scholar who is currently alive and qualified to comment rejects the authenticity of the other letters and even the Seventh, so other than the seventh it seems rather trivial to track who did or didn't think it was real, this is a page on the letters, not on the gullibility of 19th and early 20th century historians! I'll change my tune if people can point to a robust debate that's still ongoing but it... really doesn't seem like there is one? - car chasm (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]