Talk:Classical Armenian orthography

	Classical Armenian orthography is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved per consensus. bd2412 T 19:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional Armenian orthography → Classical Armenian orthography – More common and more accurate, see also Classical Armenian. Plus, in Armenian, it's called "դասական" dasakan, which is "classical", not "traditional". --Relisted. — Amakuru (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Երևանցի ^talk 21:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Google Books results[reply]

"Classical Armenian orthography" - 58 results
"Traditional Armenian orthography" - 17 results

Oppose - There are many examples on Google UK page results:
"Traditional Armenian orthography" - 4,640,000 results
"Classical Armenian orthography" - 668,000 results Maurice07 (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm. What does Google UK has to do with academia? Google Books is the prime resource for academic works widely used in such cases. --Երևանցի ^talk 22:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - OK. In my opinion,your references is not correct. Take a look at! Google Books:

"Traditional Armenian orthography" / 22 results
"Classical Armenian orthography" / 9 results Maurice07 (talk) 22:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, because you removed "-LLc -Wiki" from the search bar. Withour those two Google Books also searches in Wikipedia content. Take a look at the matches, the top one is a collection of Wiki articles: Traditional Armenian Orthography, Romanization of Armenian, Spelling reform of the Armenian language 1922-1924 And almost half of the rest is by the same author, Richard Hovannisian. He's a respected author, however, his usage of "Traditional Armenian orthography" doesn't make it more common. It's 58 vs 17 in my search, which is almost 3.5 times greater. --Երևանցի ^talk 23:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per nomination. 23 editor (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Case has been made, opposition seems based on some rather peculiar "evidence". Andrewa (talk) 00:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~. The suggested title alludes to Classical antiquity, and so is misleading. The material is more recent, and "traditional" is the more appropriate word. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, it does not. The language is called Classical Armenian, not Traditional Armenian, and this orthography is of that language. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, to match Classical Armenian. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Classical" seems better than "Traditional", although none of them is reflecting the Armenian naming "Մեսրոպեան ուղղագրութիւն".--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.