Jump to content

Talk:Tom Stevenson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Tom Stevenson (author))

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No consensus for move: 4v2 is not an overwhelming majority, and no particularly strong arguments nor supporting evidence have been provided for this article's claim to primacy. Parsecboy (talk) 01:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or rather, requested undo of previous undiscussed move. I don't see that moving this article to "Tom Stevenson (author)", in order to make "Tom Stevenson" a redirect to "Thomas Stevenson (disambiguation)" is warranted or necessary. Here is an article with a precise name, and a clear primary topic with unique namespace, and it is made a redirect as an abbreviation of another name? It makes no sense to me, and this is a case where a hatnotes would suffice. MURGH disc. 12:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comm: Is his legal name "Tom"? MURGH disc. 22:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For the name "Tom Stevenson"? The wine writer is the clear primary. Look at the regular google hits for Tom Stevenson and the nearly 23,000 hits for the Tom Stevenson plus wine compared to the minuscule 346 hits for "Tom Stevenson lighthouse". Even "Thomas Stevenson lighthouse" only pulls up a little over 9000 hits. There is no contest here. AgneCheese/Wine 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whether or not his "legal" name is Tom, this wine writer appears to be the primary usage for "Tom Stevenson", and the lighthouse engineer is the primary usage for "Thomas". Neither of them appears to be known by the other version of the name. It makes sense to have these two as primary usages, and have a single dab page, linked from these two, to connect all the other Tom/Thomas Stevensons. PamD (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree with your interpretation of those Google figures. What you've established is that there is an ambiguity, as the lighthouse designer does get some hits as Tom, and that there are far more websites discussing wine than discussing lighthouses. Andrewa (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An overwhelming testament of Google hits shows that there is no ambiguity. While there is a few straggling mentions of "Tom" in relation to the lighthouse designer, the overwhelming and primary usage of Tom Stevenson is clearly the wine writer. Just because there are few straggling reference to Paris, Texas as "Paris" doesn't mean that there is any ambiguity about what the primary usage of Paris is. AgneCheese/Wine 00:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. There are many things that can skew the Google results, so simple counts of Google hits are no case at all. They're useful in indicating where to look for better evidence, but that's about all.
We need to ask what the reason is for this imbalance. It might be, as you suggest, that nearly everyone who uses the name Tom Stevenson does mean this author. Or it might just mean that there are more webpages concerning wine than lighthouses, and there are. Or looking deeper, it might mean that this Tom Stevenson is mainly of contemporary interest in areas with lots of web users, while the other Thomas Stevenson is of historical interest, and therefore of interest worldwide and in the longer term, and he is. Lots of things to consider.
It's not all that important. The most important thing is to have a combined disambig page, so everyone can get to the article they want in a reasonable number of mouse clicks. Andrewa (talk) 01:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

You know what is odd....the original no-consensus move that took place a few days ago would have obviously failed. Yet for some reason you now need a "super majority" to correct it? Where is that in Wikipedia policy. I actually think WP:BRD should be applicable. The original bold page move should be reverted as there is a clear lack of consensus for that. AgneCheese/Wine 03:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. There is no evidence for anyone else being called "Tom", and the move should clearly have been reverted. PamD (talk) 08:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adulation

[edit]

The whole entry sounds more like an eulogy to Tom Stevenson than a matter-of-fact style encyclopedia entry. Having read books by him myself I do not doubt his expertise. But statements like "In this book, Stevenson has shown that he has the gift of taking vast quantities of knowledge and experience and translating them into lucid, sparkling prose, easily graspable by the novice, yet still interesting and instructive to the connoisseur." are in my opinion not fit for encyclopedias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.87.19.25 (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed unsourced information

[edit]

[he has published 23 books], the most important of which have been published internationally by more than 50 publishers and translated into over 25 languages

Although Stevenson's first writings on wine were published in Decanter in the late 1970s, a magazine for which he still writes, he was a more prolific contributor to WINE Magazine for consumers and Wine & Spirit International for the trade (both since merged into Wine & Spirit) during the 1980s and 1990s. At the time he was known for his monthly "Fizz File" column in WINE Magazine, and for being the author of the award winning annual Champagne supplements for both of these magazines.

Wine Report was the recipient of "Best in World" prizes three times at the Gourmand International Awards, and in 2006 it became the only wine book to be inducted into Gourmand's Hall of Fame (a feat unmatched by other wine books until 2007 when joined by The World Atlas of Wine and Bordeaux et ses Vins).

Stevenson has been chairman of Champagne and Alsace panels at the "Decanter World Wine Awards" since its inception, and has judged at other major competitions in France, Germany, Greece, Australia and the U.S.

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citogenesis Warning

[edit]

It appears sources are reporting that Tom has won "Wine Writer of the Year" three times, when the RS I can track down only says he was nominated three times. Information was added by someone with an apparent COI, and sources produced since report the won three times claim. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tom_Stevenson&oldid=1246954120"