Talk:Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions, 2000–2004

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions

Quotes

I think there are way too many quotes in this (and accompanying) pages. The quotes are all lifted from unreliable sources and, while a few are good to establish the sort of messages the ALF leave behind, by reproducing them all we are beginning to look like a conduit for their propaganda, especially when we are not quoting the justification for the businesses the ALF attack. There are few other articles with even have the number of quotes as this one. I propose a (humane) cull. Rockpocket 18:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I'll trim it down as well as 2005-Present by taking out the repitive quotes etc and others, leave the few that make sense to have. User:TomLovesCake/Talk 22:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed there are too many, I was getting a bit lazy explaining what the ALF had done, so was overly quoted. I've trimmed it down 3KB from quotes, mainly those that are propaganda orientated and repetihttp://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_of_Animal_Liberation_Front_actions%2C_2000-2004&action=edit&section=1

Editing Talk:Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions, 2000-2004 (section) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediative. I understand that there are a lack of quotes to justification for the businesses the ALF attack, although I have tried to include has many as I could find and included them.

However, I think this can be balanced by leaving the intimidating and threatening quotes, although not the repetitive ones, as people will surely be concerned by these quotes and will want to read them, like the media quote. Therefore the balance comes from taking away the ALF's apparant "compassionate" edge, and putting into perspective what sort of things they threaten etc; which most people dissagree with.

Finally, as I was going through the FBI list, I noticed that they consistently said what relationship the businesses had with HLS, therefore the resource for the "connection" with HLS is not through Bite Back, but confirmed by the FBI. This was exactly the same for the number of animals taken, as well as the most of the vanadalism done. However, if the FBI confirm an act of "vandalism" has taken place, the claim on Bite Back is surely as reliable as can be, as it is only a matter of choice as to whether the mainstream quote them, which most of the time they do when they report on actions. So I don't see the problem with the descriptions etc (as long as not NPOV contradicting), because the FBI have confirmed the action has taken place, and only done so because activists have reported it and they have checked it has happened.

Let me know what you think. Talk / TomLovesCake 02:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bite Back is as about reliable as it gets with regards to what the ALF claim, but they can only be used to validate their own actions, not anyone elses, and they are not sufficient to establish notability. This "FBI list" your refer to is not produced by the FBI, but the FBR: Foundation for Biomedical Research. All they do is scan the Animal liberation communiques and collate them into a spreadsheet. [1] So they are not confirming anything other than the original claims, they are no more of a WP:RS than Bite Back and being on that list does not confer notability. Therefore anything that is only sourced by the FBR can be treated as being only sourced by the citation they provide (typically Bite Back). In other words, a reliable third party source is required for notability.

I don't have an issue with using Bite Back as a source for a quote in a genuinely notable incident (like the bomb attack on the UCLA researcher), but when there is weak notability then adding a quote seems excessive. Rockpocket 02:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions, 2000–04. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of Animal Liberation Front actions, 2000–04. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017054525/http://www.sarconline.co.uk/botox/index.html to http://www.sarconline.co.uk/botox/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]