Talk:New Haven v. Thomas Hogg

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from New Haven v. Thomas Hogg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Thomas Hogg was accused of fathering piglets because they resembled him, which was allegedly proven when the mother sow became aroused by him?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February.

Wikipedia

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Date format

American because it is American, or British because it was a colony at the time?--Epeefleche (talk) 01:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "the situation [presumably the case, or perhaps its outcome] left a permanent mark on capital punishment jurisprudence", but stops there. How did it do so? That we've (mostly) never heard of the case argues otherwise. This point should be expanded on. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know. The source simply states that "not surprisingly, the situation left an indelible mark on death penalty jurisprudence". Unfortunately, it does not elaborate on this. It would be very useful if we knew more, though. Is there anything we can do about it? Surtsicna (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]