Talk:The Time Is Not Yet Ripe

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Time Is Not Yet Ripe is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Time is Not Yet Ripe → The Time Is Not Yet Ripe – "Is" is a verb and part of proper name, so it should be uppercased per WP:NCCAPS. George Ho (talk) 09:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 07:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the sources all seem to use the current article title format. Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly true, _____. Sources: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Amount of other sources using either case is mixed. George Ho (talk) 02:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I checked a few of them and must have just been mislead by luck. I'll Support based on this evidence. Insert CleverPhrase Here 08:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Am happy to go with consensus Dutchy85 (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dutchy85: no offence but this seems to be the most useless comment I've ever seen in an RM. it would be determined by consensus anyway, is there something I'm missing about your comment? Insert CleverPhrase Here 08:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per MOS:CT. "Is" is a verb, and therefore should be capitalized. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:CT. Deor (talk) 12:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.