Jump to content

Talk:The Oath (Peretti novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:The Oath (Peretti))

Spoiler

[edit]

I think the "Symbols" section gives away way too much information. If someone wants to know what the predator is, read the book! Not Wikipedia. Scorpionman 15:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See 'WP: SPOILERS' Lots42 (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oath.jpg

[edit]

Image:Oath.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Peretti45.jpg

[edit]

Image:Peretti45.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

book discusion

[edit]

this is a great book and i would encourage you to read it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.79.213 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Oath Alternative Symbolic Meaning

A person that no longer cares about his or her rash will also no longer care about what sins they have committed. Once they have compromised their values and no longer care, they will begin to do the same in other areas. The dragon, or Satan, will then be able to take them over completely, while they continuously sin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MD Pynakker (talkcontribs) 22:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overview

[edit]

I'm pretty sure the overview section is taken verbatim from the blurb on the front interior cover...that is not allowed if so. Lots42 (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Oath (Frank E. Peretti novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Oath (Peretti novel)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I think that this article needs to be re-rated; it's definitely not a stub anymore. There's a detailed and well-written plot overview and summary, the symbolism section was cleaned up, and more information was added. Waluigi Freak 99 14:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and changed the rating to B class, and I also raised the importance from Low to Mid. (This Present Darkness, Piercing the Darkness, The Visitation and The Oath should be the only Peretti novels noted as Mid-importance here, in my opinion.) Feel free to comment if you have a complaint.Waluigi Freak 99 18:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)