Jump to content

Talk:Numbers Gang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:The Numbers Gang)

WP:SAFRICA assessment

[edit]

Assessed as C-Class. Some good content but needs a lot of editing for style to attain a higher assessment. Ron2K (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some of the sentences and phrases sounds more like they are from a book I've read by Charles van Onselen called " The Small matter of a lost horse",Bobbyshabangu talk 18:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I went through and all internet links were 404 or to non-news white supremacist sites. Not sure on the non-internet links. I would consider this potentially very biased and low quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.14.43.230 (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

[edit]

Mostly seems to be copyvio of Nongoloza's Children All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 05:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.csvr.org.za/docs/gangs/nongolozaschildren.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 23:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umkosi Wezintaba

[edit]

There seems to be some overlap between this article and Umkosi Wezintaba, specifically regarding the origin of the gang. If that is the case, the articles should reflect this in the text. Park3r (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 section does not make sense and does not have any source

[edit]
The 26s run all prisons in the province of KwaZulu-Natal and are mostly active in Durban and uMgungundlovu district of Pietermaritzburg.

First of all, both Durban and Pietermaritzburg are in KwaZulu-Natal so either they run all the prisons in the province .... or they are mostly active in 2 parts of it. Also, there is no source to the claim that they run all the prisons.

Durban, also known as eThekwini is one of those cities that is completely ran by the 26s by having gangs like Olova BoMpevu also known as Ama-14, Amadando, TDK Gangsters, etc.

Again, no source and the city is most certainly not "completely ran by the 26s", we also who are "Olova BoMpevu, Ama-14, Amadando, TDK Gangsters, etc.", those are just random names of unknown people. No source is given of who they are and what they have to do with the numbers.

FFMG (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, rambling, few citations

[edit]

This whole article is in dire need of a rewrite. Long stretches of statements about the group that are lacking any citations and read like some teenage edgelord's ideas of South African prison gang lore rather than realistic descriptions. 24.208.136.249 (talk) 04:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]