Talk:The Crown season 1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Crown season 1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 20/12/23. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

'Historical inaccuracies' section

@Nyxaros, why have you added a list of historical inaccuracies to the article? I believe it's just copied over from The Crown, where I recently removed it for being unencyclopaedic; a paragraph or two on how the season's inaccuracies (or accuracies) were perceived would be fine, but we don't need to list examples. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros, it is impossible to make progress on this issue while you continue to revert without engaging in discussion. Please respond here so we can resolve things. A.D.Hope (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is unencyclopedic. I wrote that you should get other users' opinion, not (just) mine. ภץאคгöร 17:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the material is appropriate for Wikipedia, as if readers want to read about all the inaccuracies in a season they can do so in the sources we cite or in one of the many other articles which cover them. Covering them here is an excessive level of WP:DETAIL, and a summary of the response to the inaccuracies (with a single example if necessary) would serve readers better. A.D.Hope (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]