Talk:Bangles (EP)

A fact from Bangles (EP) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the complete five-song set of the Bangles' debut EP remained out of print for over 30 years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Bangles (EP).

Wikipedia

"The Bangles sound very raw on this record..." The paragraph beginning with that phrase is a personal review of the album. Is there a way to possibly re-word to still acknowledge the difference in sound without making a review? Or should the paragraph just be deleted? susanbamboozlin 20:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to put into words what one hears, and I suppose any such description of the record must be subjective. I think it is a fair description. It is very raw compared with their later work; there is no getting away from that. ralphroysterdoyster

Fair use rationale for Image:Bangles EP.jpg

Image:Bangles EP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The title of the album is not “The Bangles”; it is simply “Bangles,” just like the name of the group was until about 2000. Both the text of the article and the cover graphic at right reflect this. Should the title of the article be changed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOtter (talk • contribs) 14:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? There reads: Bangles is the eponymous first EP by The Bangles (at the time they were still known as The Bangs)

Eponymous means the name of the EP should be "The Bangs",as at the time they were still known as The Bangs.

Or is it supposed to be as the above poster put it? That is: "at the time they were still known as Bangles", and article's name to just "Bangles". The current situation does not make sense. 85.217.14.230 (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bangles Single/EP?

I have a Bangles 3' CD3 from 1982 called: Bangles. It's different than the one listed here in that it only has 3 songs: "The Real World," Remixed by David Kahne - "Previously Unreleased" and as far as I know, not on any albums; Mary Street, that says it's "From the I.R.S. EP "Bangles" SP 70506"; and I'm In Line (with the same credits as Mary Street). I can make scans for anyone.

albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 20:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]