Talk:The Art of War (Machiavelli book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: Technology Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Thanks to Weitman, for enhancing and cleaning up this article. Cheers, sir! :)--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 08:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Lesser-read"

While it's true The Art of War is fairly obscure today, historically it was a very important and influential work. Makers of Modern Strategy listed Machiavelli as the reinventor of military strategy and the book was widely translated across Europe within decades of publication. We should consider rewording the first sentence to reflect the historical importance of the book, rather than it's present obscurity. 65.182.233.83 (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC) I find that agreeable.Czar Baldy Bald IV (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Well like — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.88.210.135 (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]