Talk:Ted Cruz 2016 presidential campaign

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ted Cruz 2016 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Hispanic and Latino / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).

Caitlyn Jenner endorsement

There are news articles that report that Jenner likes Cruz and would like to be Cruz's "Trans Ambassador". --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it looks like it's not being considered an official endorsement. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 18:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Trump may be a rat, but I have no desire to copulate with him".

Is this bawdy comment from Cruz notable enough to include? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Tuesday section

I find the beginning of the section Ted Cruz presidential campaign, 2016#Super Tuesday very difficult to understand. The wording is:

Prior to the evening of the Iowa Caucus, the Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz campaigns used a past GOP mailing tactic to target Iowa voters, using the published state voter roster entries. The contents were in an envelope appearing to originate from an election authority to prioritize the recipients attention to it. Some recipients determined they were intimidated by the content, revealing their past voter participation and their adjacent neighbors' participation.[124][125] Then, caucus evening in Iowa, a local report repeated live on-air by CNN's Dana Bash, hearing a producer's voice in the intercom earpiece (interruptible foldback or IFB), remotely verifying a tweet from an embed CNN reporter source, Chris Moody, following the Carson campaign and quoting Ben Carson, his itinerary to go home to Florida before the night's caucus results and then to Washington, DC prayer breakfast, not New Hampshire or South Carolina.[126][127] Ted Cruz apologized via a direct phone call to Dr. Ben Carson, immediately the following day. Cruz publicly stated he apologized to Dr. Ben Carson directly and took responsibility for the campaign communications, including Iowa Representative Steve King's extrapolation to the Cruz Iowa caucus captains. Media outlet political pundits subscribe that Carson was following the course of a victim of the circumstance, when he did not accept Cruz's apology, thus allowing Trump to take up offense for Carson and Trump becoming a victim of the same circumstance, stealing Trump's win in Iowa. Carson, following the course of a victim of circumstance, is not Presidential, possibly persuading GOP voters to select a stronger candidate, in subsequent contests.

In particular, the long sentence beginning "Then, caucus evening in Iowa..." makes very little sense. I can tell something was said on CNN about Carson, but not how Cruz was involved. The end of the paragraph is uncited and goes into editorializing. I have tagged this because I lack enough insight into what this section is aiming to say to edit it myself. Fences&Windows 11:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some cleanup on the wording and removed the very long final sentence that was already tagged as editorializing and had no sourcing to it. Let me know if that works for you? Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz, that section makes sense now. Fences&Windows 21:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caucus and primary section

I admittedly started that section though after seeing the Rubio campaign article I've become convinced that the article would be better off merging that into the campaign section. The only thing we would lose would be the results templates which I don't think we need. Informant16 16 April 2016

John Boehner's insults

We should mention that John Boehner accused Cruz of being the devil and a "son of a bitch" [1]. --212.186.14.29 (talk) 11:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primary results

According to The Green Papers, Cruz placed second among Republicans in the primary with 7,822,100 votes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.38.14 (talk) 02:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]