Jump to content

Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and The Five/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAreviwew.Pyrotec (talk) 09:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with refs

[edit]

I'm putting the article On Hold at this point, as there are problems with the in-line citations, but I will carry on reading (and if necessary editing) the article.

They are:

  • The Notes section contains references to Figis, with page numbers; but Figis does not appear in the Bibliography.Pyrotec (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Notes, for instance, invoke references to multiple books by David Brown.
  • Ref 3 (Brown, Tchaikovsky: Man and Music, 49.) does not match any of the listed books.
  • Ref 21 (Brown, David, "Balakirev, Tchaikovsky and Nationalism," 132.) does not match any of the listed books.
  • Ref 32 (Quoted in Brown, Tchaikovsky: Man and Music, 46.) does not match any of the listed books.
  • In some cases it is obvious, e.g. Brown, Tchaikovsky: The Early Years, 128; Holden, 63.
  • This could be solved if the following format was used - Ref 3 (Brown, 1999, 49.) Valid reference dates are 1978, 1983, 1991, 1995, 2002. See Wikipedia:Citing sources

Pyrotec (talk) 17:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bibliography has been updated to include these sources. My apologies for their not being there earlier. Jonyungk (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, wide-ranging, readable article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the article, it is a very good Good Article.Pyrotec (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]