Talk:Tariq Jamil

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 29 October 2014, see discussion.
no consensus, 3 June 2013, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

"Jameel" vs "Jamil"

It appears that most sources use "Jameel". If someone thinks it should be changed, please explain and provide sources. Please do not change links, titles in references, etc. --Ronz (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't change in indian subcontinent people call name by different sounds and words. Slaveraza (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

actually it normally refer as jameel but the actual documents of the person have spell with jamil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullahsheikh7 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok Mobinul Islam siam (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I'm not clear that there's been enough coi-influenced editing to justify the article tag, but I've restored it in the hope that it will help resolve some of the recent editing problems. --Ronz (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Tariq jameel.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

1422630261 Tariq-Jameel.jpeg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism on Tariq Jamil

Please add Criticism on Tariq Jamil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiacc97 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not consistent with Wikipedia BLP policies. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GorgeCustersSabre: What? Why not? --Saqib (talk) 14:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image

@GorgeCustersSabre: You could have altered the wording instead of outright removing a sourced and uncontroversial passage. "Is said" is absolutely fine wording and can be found in several BLP's. However I've changed the wording for now. Instead of hard reverting next time, please take time to debate. --Saqib (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Views on COVID-19

Tariq Jamil’s statements on the cause of the COVID-19 outbreak, and public criticism by government ministers and other figures, are certainly notable enough to be included, and the section is reliably sourced. Jamil’s fans have repeatedly tried to remove the section or modify it to read benignly. I hope my fellow editors can help to keep this section neutral, factual and reliably referenced. Thanks, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Request to include his recent twitter clarification and support conferred to him also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.149.18.34 (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

This page used to be protected earlier and only verified users could edit it.

I think that protection has now been removed and there has been a lot of back and forth between real users and the following:

39.45.7.53 39.32.208.14 39.32.208.14 173.72.148.88 39.36.217.252 157.47.32.31

Can someone with the right privileges please protect the article again? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monatowfik (talk • contribs) 23:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Jurisprudence

@GorgeCustersSabre:

I would like to get your opinion on the following source and extracts:

The reformist Deobandi and Tablighi networks (Hanafi Sunni) were centred on the Islamic Seminary in Deoband, North India, which was founded in 1866 by Muhammad Qasim Nanaotawi (1832–79) and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi (1829–1905), two conservative scholars...
— Reetz, Dietrich. (2010). ‘Alternate’ Globalities? On The Cultures And Formats Of Transnational Muslim Networks From South Asia 10.1163/ej.9789004181168.i-452.83

The same source later says:

The latter is the case for Tariq Jameel, a Deobandi scholar, running his own Madrasa in Faisalabad, and a leading functionary of the Tablighi Jama‘at
— Reetz, Dietrich. (2010). ‘Alternate’ Globalities? On The Cultures And Formats Of Transnational Muslim Networks From South Asia 10.1163/ej.9789004181168.i-452.83

Would this form adequate evidence that Tariq Jamil is a Hanafi, or do you think it would lapse into OR and Synthesis?

Look forward to your reply. ParthikS8 (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Real Birthplace

So is his birthplace not Tulamba, Punjab Pakistan but Mian Channu. It used to be Tulamba on this biography but who changed, and why, wheres the source. 24.13.28.25 (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saf E AWAL K

ahqar Gulab ali 2404:3100:1C9A:7117:1:0:8B22:60A1 (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review of BLP sources and Unreliable sources tags

Saqib, Hi there! I took a closer look at the sources in the article after noticing you tagged it[1] with {{BLP sources}} and {{Unreliable sources}}. From what I can see, each claim is supported by WP:RS that appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines for reliability and verifiability, especially for biographies of living persons. If there's a particular source or statement you're concerned about, could you point it out? I'd be happy to check it again or discuss any specific issues. Otherwise, it might make sense to remove the tags, as the article seems solid from a sourcing perspective. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]