This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
@Vaselineeeeeeee:, @CHING WAI KONG: According to press release, the deal was a loan + obligation to buy, which the obligation was achieved on 6 February (after the window closed), but please stop original research (and interpretation ) of the real effective date of the transfer was 1 July. It happened on 6 February and it was the same treatment in Ervin Zukanović (the obligation was excised in February). We put Simone Zaza's effective date on 1 July, because the press release say so. Matthew hk (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So are you saying we should still list it as a loan or not? Both Football Italia and this release by Juve clearly state the loan is until 30 June, so to me that means we should also classify this as a loan until 1 July. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★13:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Loan period, January to 6 February. It is too original research to determinate the end date of such "Loan + obligation " is not the date of the announcement. Matthew hk (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But we know the loan period will definitively end 30 June. So keep → loan for now. It looks the same in the infobox for Zaza with Valencia, and then Torino after this season's loan period. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★13:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Zaza's press release in specific mentioned the definitive deal (To Valencia) would be effective after the loan deal. While for Zukanović and Sturaro and many other similar players, the press release wording was bought already on that date, instead of will/would bought. Matthew hk (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know - it might be original research to interpret the wording based on those key words. It does say he was terminated, but then it does say his loan will continue until 30 June. Why would they say the loan will end 30 June if he was already bought outright by Genoa? It would be like Genoa are loaning him to themselves. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★13:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Football Italia (or Goal.com English) is a bad tertiary source, it often translate the original news article in La Gazzetta wrong, they are the only English source BTW. If putting the WP:DUE and WP:UNDUE criteria, i doubt reporting in Italian language, would retain the loan still go on wording for the 6 February outright signing by Grnoa. Matthew hk (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
