Jump to content

Talk:St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

Any reason the apostrophe is not used in the title of this article, when it is used in the name of the company involved in the case? Just a common typo? Can we rename the article accordingly? - 80.99.78.232 (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs equal treatment for First Nation position, as well as more detail overall.Skookum1 10:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 06:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)