Talk:Snooze (song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: PSA (talk · contribs) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 14:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Will review this in a few days :)) Arconning (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Prose and MoS
[edit]Lead and infobox
[edit]- The main vocals are complemented by several layers of harmonies beneath, and a riff appears on the song's beginning., I'd suggest changing "on" to "in" or "at".
- Love the lead btw! Amazing writing. :)
Background
[edit]- No issues here on prose and MoS.
Composition
[edit]- No issues here, song is dreamy indeed.
Production
[edit]- Upon finishing the demo, BLK sent his work to Leon Thomas III, who, along with Khris Riddick-Tynes, compose the production duo the Rascals., I think it's a me problem but is "compose" in this sentence referring to the band or the song? If either answer would be given, would it be better to put composed?
Lyrics
[edit]- No issues.
Release
[edit]- No issues.
Critical reception
[edit]- No issues!
Commercial performance
[edit]- as a non-single track,, omit the comma.
Music video
[edit]- Well, that was a read.
- to nothing but a G-string underwear, omit "a" and wikilink "G-string underwear" if there's an applicable page.
Live performances and covers
[edit]- "John Legend" should probably be wikilinked.
Accolades, credits, charts, certifications, and release history
[edit]- Tables are formatted well with proper sourcing.
Refs
[edit]- Earwig just picks up lyrics, other possible violations are the same, so it's fine.
- Random spotchecks: 1, 11, 25, 26, 35, 36, 46, 53, 75, 84, 118. All good
- Fix citation 102 for the article about John Legend, seems not formatted properly.
Media
[edit]- Images and audio file have proper licensing and are relevant to the article.
Misc
[edit]- No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information, neutral as I see no bias whatsoever.
PSA, amazing writing btw! Here are my short comments. Arconning (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review and kind words, @Arconning. All your suggestions have been implemented. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] 23:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.