This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
I removed this part from the paragraph about Momesso's trade to Vancouver "and is still regarded as perhaps the best trade in Canuck franchise history" since it's speculation and I can't find any reference to support this. There are some articles on how it was a great trade for Vancouver but certainly not the best.Yojimbo1941 (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the quality assessment on this article from C to Start class this morning, because it is lacking in inline citations, and 3 of the 5 references it does have are bare URLs. PKT(alk)13:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. It's written like a fan would write a tweet, with too many buzzwords.
While the topic is notable and the article contains current (as of 2022) information, it's overall style needs a lot of wrok, if not a complete rewrite.
A lizard (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
