Jump to content

Talk:Senedd building/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Way too many lists! Needs to be cut back on the lists.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    One reference needed; marked with {{fact}}
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Very on-topic.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Follows NPOV
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Many great images/
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Good article. I like those table with the colors. Really only one problem in this article: the lists. If those list are removed, I think this article has potential for FA. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]