Talk:Sasoli

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sasoli article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BRANCHES

1.SIRAJ ZAI 2.HOOTMAN ZAI 3.SHIEK UMAR 4.GUARANANJU 5.SOOPAK 6.SALAY ZAI 7.GHAHZA ZAI 8.HARAND 9.MOOTHA ZAI 10.BADOU ZAI 11.KAHANI 12.BHATIAR 13.WADGOO 14.lorajo

Not a speedy

It looks like that Sasoli is an actual tribe [1]. What we have here is an WP:OR and not a hoax. M0RD00R (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original article

SASOLI

(i.e)A baloch tribe related with houth baloch they became sasoli due to area named as sasol in khuzdar at ancient times it was living land of kurds houth and rind tribes they migrated to different lands named as sasoli due to theirs old land sasol.that sasoli who were under the hand of chief of mengel and they were known as mengel sasoli and those who were become under the sardar zehri and known as sasoli zehri.in this way thoes sasolies whoes setlled around the belfith river and named as sasoli bilfath.Languages to be spoken i.e balochi and brahavi .

Please clean it up and source it. M0RD00R (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested correction

Sasoli is a baloh tribe its belong to hooth tribe.—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User: | ]] ([[User talk: |talk]] • contribs)

Can you reference that? Our current only source says they are a division of the Zehri tribe so I undid your change as it also removed the citation and the categories, --Tikiwont (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes i proved sasoli division of hooth tribe not a zehri tribe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.149.25 (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can i or anybody else verify that? and please try to avoid removing other posts. We all try to get this right here.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-> No SASOLI tribe is very old tribe its name was Sasol before and then Named SASOLI it is very OLD tribe of Baloch Nation For Variffication You can check that there is a stone in khan of kalats Kila meeri we say there are the names of old baloch tribes and name sasoli is present there so its wrong that sasoli is a part of Hooth, Mengal, Zehri its only one nation from All Balochistan since these tribes are came into being sasoli is very Old Nation its 100% True you can see it by books by History ThanKs.

read tarikh nasimi, by ulfat naseem ,,

isko pado

Well a quote and a more usable citation would be fine. Meanwhile I'd suggest to take that into account as alternative.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]