Talk:ST Kinetics

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Southeast Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:STK logo.jpg

Image:STK logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

50MG Machine Gun

Shouldnt this gun have its own article? its pretty unique and interesting. Read here if your interested --Climax Void ☭.

Advertisement?

This article is generally well referenced and well written, but towards the end it seems like the product list turns into a product advertisement. Maybe its just me, but if you agree just add this template to the article.

‹ The template below (Promotional) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

--70.15.4.226 (talk) 04:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guess it's just you because I find it informative, what with me being so ignorant with what I thought was their core business in Singapore when they actually have more overseas than just defense related fields, I am just amazed at that. -- Dave1185 (talk) 10:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually ready to add the tag before checking the discussion page. Yes, it is quite informative, but it could reach the same level of informing with quite a lot less detail and trumpeting. 85.178.115.56 (talk) 01:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BX mk2.jpg

The image Image:BX mk2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bronco ATTC only one of two ATTCs in the world?

This is a nonsensical claim and needs to be editted out, I personally know of more than 2 beyond the Bronco/Warthog and the BVS10 quoted. Hell, even Singapore uses the BV206 not to mention the Russian line of ATTCs which ST Kinetics claimed to have gotten the coupling system from during the BAE lawsuit for copyright infringement. The irony of it all is that after saying that there is only the Bronco and the BVS10, the article then brings up the Russian system as possible competition. In case someone failed maths, that is already 3 types, so the "only 2" claim is obviously wrong.

I'll try to edit it to a less parchocial viewpoint, but the statement is so inbuilt into the article it is going to be difficult. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.74.135.177 (talk) 11:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ST Kinetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.citycab.com.sg/abtus/cc_history.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006092748/http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_websites/topics/Weapons/bx2/about.html to http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_websites/topics/Weapons/bx2/about.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on ST Kinetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]