Talk:SFCG Co.

Unneeded items should be removed

It might be better if everything that is not needed could be removed. It can be put back later, after we have a solid base. Tom Harrison ^Talk 02:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

In Japan, victims by the collection that abused a loan by a large sum of money profit of SFCG and a law appear one after another.The Japanese administration of justice denies credit collection technique of SFCG, and administration goes to a direction of regulation reinforcement, too. There is a fund of SFCG by "a corporate bond" to publish abroad.An investment from Japan does not take financing from a bank only in the stock market either, and most are attracted by finance by a corporate bond from foreign countries. For large sum of money profit / victim enlarged prevention of the collection that abused a law to be able to employ in Japan, an effect of leaving investment from foreign countries to SFCG is big.Therefore it is not touched at all when SFCG receives an investment about duties stop by administrative deposition and a precedent of collection technique of SFCG in a court of law by a report for people of overseas investing of SFCG because it is inconvenient.Therefore I carried the thing which translated it into English.Of course I think that it is necessary for investor protection.

AfD

The article survived an AfD. The discussion can be found here. enochlau (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Removing what I cannot verify

I requested translation of the corresponding article on the Japanese Wikipedia, but no one has done that yet. I have tried to read over some of the source documents and divine the article creator's intent, but with little success. At this point there seem to be some serious allegations of misconduct that I don't fully understand and can't support by citation. I'm going to remove a lot of the article. If the translatation comes in, or someone with a better understanding than I have chooses to edit the page to add sources, maybe it can be put back. Tom Harrison ^Talk 16:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Article expansion

This article needs serious expansion as it's basically a collection of links right now. There is plenty over on the Japanese page, so that would be a good place to start. Also, several of the English links have enough to expand the article a decent bit. --nihon 19:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Changed importance

I changed this article's importance to low. It really doesn't have much interest besides a very specialized area. MightyAtom 22:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Neutrality of Japanese article is contested

I'd like to note that the Japanese article has a lengthy comment on its talk page questioning its neutrality. The main criticisms are that the article reads more like reportage than an encyclopedia piece, takes the stance that "SFCG is evil", makes statements like "sales staff were set extremely tough quotas" without any justification or definition of what constitutes "tough", and makes moral judgements like "this is morally unacceptable". I agree with these criticisms - at least, the article clearly does not take a neutral point of view.

Would someone like to comment on whether it is appropriate to translate an article like this, or whether it needs to be treated in a special way? Grgcox 07:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Since no-one replied, I've gone ahead and translated the article. -- Grgcox 16:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Removal of most of article

I have removed most of the content of the article as it is completely unsourced and mostly negative. I also removed a huge pile of external links which had no direct connection to the company (determined by reviewing the content of the ELs), or where the links were completely invalid/dead. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)