Talk:Right to manage

This page was proposed for deletion by Bencherlite (talk · contribs) on 7 June 2007 with the comment:
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide
It was contested by Jnlowe (talk · contribs) on June 11, 2007 with the comment:
Removed proposal to delete. The article is maybe too heavy on 'how to', but covers an important topic not previously covered in Wikipedia. Improving would be better than deleting.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lacks objectivity

This article is clearly biased against RTM groups and should be and could be written more objectively. This is clearly apparent under the "Advantages" section where more disadvantages are clearly posited. Also, numerous spelling errors.DarcieZ (talk) 20:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)DarcieZ[reply]

Agree. Many opinion pieces, for example: Under the section "Reasons to use Right to Manage": "1. To reduce service charges. Wrong - " "2. To gain control of who to use as a manager for your block of flats. Wrong again - " "In fact it is difficult to envisage a scenario where RTM is a worthwhile course of action"

Under the section "The Notice of Claim": "You really must engage a professional company to produce this otherwise you can jeopardise the entire process."

Under the section "Where any party to be served with the claim notice is not traceable": "Best always to use professional company who specialises in right to manage"

And as mentioned under Advantages, one of the those listed is a disadvantage! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.246.168.11 (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]