Talk:Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 December 2024 by reviewer Ca (talk · contribs).

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to Rhopalosiphum sanguinarium?

@Dyanega: Should this move to Rhopalosiphum sanguinarium? GBIF says so, but I know it's not always accurate. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, GBIF's entry is due to a historical misidentification, not a synonymy. "Rhopalosiphum insertum" is not a valid name, however; it is one of many junior synonyms of Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae. See this entry in the global aphid authority file, which is definitive. It should very definitely be moved to the correct name. Good that you checked. ;-) Dyanega (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]