Talk:Red warbler/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ucucha 15:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This generally looks quite good; just a few minor things:

A range map would be nice (though it is not required for GA status). Done (Thanks Cas!)

I'll see if I can get someone to help me out with that. I don't know how to do them myself! MeegsC | Talk 21:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref. 1 and 20 are basically the same thing, and it would be nice to unite them into a single ref.

Except one is the IUCN website (and is linked in a template that runs the taxobox) and the other is Birdlife International's website. Would you prefer I use the Birdlife International website for both, as it does contain the IUCN status code? The IUCN website doesn't have the population numbers. MeegsC | Talk 21:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the IUCN take their assessments for birds from BirdLife International, using BirdLife's website twice seems reasonable. But it's a minor thing. Ucucha 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ucucha 15:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the map; I am now passing the article as a GA. Ucucha 11:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Ucucha. MeegsC | Talk 12:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]