This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
I suggest Ramb III be merged into Galeb (yacht), which is longer and more-less referenced compared to this one which lacks any kind of sources. Despite significant changes it underwent during its service life, the ship is the same, and having two articles seems unnecessary and confusing for readers. My plan is to merge these two articles, and rename it to "Yugoslav yacht Galeb" beacuse, despite its service with the Regia Marina and Kriegsmarine, this ship made a name for itself for being Josip Broz Tito's yacth where he met a number of famous Cold War politicians. After this is done, I plan on expanding the article, mentioning all of its equipment and role changes and possibly nominating it for GA status if everything goes well.--Saxum (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This was discussed in 2008 at Talk:Galeb (yacht)#Merger. There was a consensus not to merge. Years passed from 2008 to 2014, and from 2014 to now, but I don't think the situation has changed. I have removed the merge tag from this article; there was no merge tag on the other article; and placed an old-merge-full tag at the top of this page referring to the 2008 proposal. This is all without prejudice to further renaming or article expansion as proposed (but probably forgotten about!) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]