Talk:Radio wave

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Radio wave article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Radio High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarification of Naming conventions used in naming different parts of the EM spectrum

According to the Microwaves page, Microwaves are 300MHz-300GHz. I think that it would be good for wikipedia to be self-consistent in its naming convention for different parts of the Electromagnetic spectrum. Including a table of references for different conventions (if necessary to help researchers, etc... navigate different conventions) might be a good idea, if the historical evolution of EM naming conventions has been such.

16:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASavantDude (talk • contribs)

Actually the Microwave article (and its sources) says there is no consensus on where the lower boundary of the microwave band is, different sources regard microwaves as beginning at 300 MHz to 3 GHz. Although I don't really think it is important, I edited the article to be be consistent with that. --Chetvorno^TALK 21:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Microwave photon

I was looking into microwave photons today, and found this article by an astrophysicist/professor (Brian Koberlein), written in everyday language. Just how big is a photon. It might be helpful to anyone looking into the topic. ("It’s a bit odd to think of a microwave photon as being larger than a baseball, but it is a simple way to explain how mesh reflectors work."

The image being shown with this article (today) is *really* helpful in visualizing how radio 'photons' are generated. One 'microwave photon' is *much* lower in energy than a light photon, so *many more* of them are needed to deliver the same energy. (More on that here, discussing microwave ovens.)

A much more 2008 technical article here titled "Generating Single Microwave Photons in a Circuit" describes an interesting application. Twang (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tune it down

The animation is a bit much, as its large and distracting from readability. -Inowen (nlfte) 08:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New inventor of radio device. Really?

Someone edited the article claiming original invention of radio devices by an indian scientist, instead of Marconi, without providing any source. 191.106.200.16 (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted. Thanks! --Chetvorno^TALK 06:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]