Jump to content

Talk:Radio (Beyoncé song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Novice7 Talk 05:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved Issues
Lead
  • The up-tempo europop song was written by Knowles, Rico Love and Dwayne Nesmith as well as Jim Jonsin who also produced the song. I suggest rewording.  Done
  • from critics who praised the depart from Knowles' usual R&B style as well as praising the believability and originality of the song and some of them even picked up the song as the high point of both the standard and deluxe editions of the album. — Similar to above. Seems more like a biased sentence to me  Done
Production
  • in a "with energy" tempo — what does it mean? .......... Replaced by "vivace"
  • the producer behind "Sweet Dreams" — change to the producer of "Sweet Dreams"  Done
  • "Radio" was told to be different form the usual R&B material Beyoncé is known for and in a way, the song symbolised her brief evasion from her usual music style — similarity with above cases. Reword  Done
  • electro influences are displayed in "Radio — the given reference does not say anything about that. ............ Removed.
  • The believability as well as its lyrics — believability about what?  Done
  • which mainly praised — consider using some other word in place of which
  • " brief depart " — again, departure  Done
Critical reception
  • Many instances of biased and poor sentences. Correct. ........... I tried my level best and wrote the section again.
Live performances
  • Seems okay
Chart performance
  • Also seems okay
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: