Talk:Quickie (sexual act)

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

This should really be part of Human sexual behavior, since that article chronicles overall sexual activity (and not just intercourse). Unless this article expands itself, there doesn't appear to be much to say about a "Quickie" that cannot be said on another page that is more developed. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is hilarious! Especially the picture! That alone is enough to keep it... Paxuniv (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very brief. Something funnily appropriate about that.oknazevad (talk) 20:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missed the Pic: or am I being "Pic"-y? Yilante June 10th, 2012 2602:306:CE49:6C00:223:12FF:FE23:6CFE (talk) 00:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a sentence relating to the possible enjoyment of both sexes (without the need of lubricant) to add another viewpoint! (Phoebemarplehorvat (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Comment: I can add more to this article, but I'm with Bignole that this article should be merged to the Human sexual activity article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

This article has several unsourced assertions about the female sexual response such as "It, however, does not provide a woman enough time to lubricate naturally." This is phrased as a categorical statement of fact and as such is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.39.35.10 (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "It, however, does not provide a woman enough time to lubricate naturally." is actually a fact, as research has consistently shown that women need substantially more time than men to become sexually aroused. On average, anyway. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That stated, the way the content was worded was problematic because women do become sexually aroused, with sufficient vaginal lubrication in some cases, during quickie sex. So I changed that text to this. As for "several unsourced assertions about the female sexual response," where? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:45, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is important to make several paragraphs, for the reader's sake. One sentence didn't have any subject: I reworded it. The article is good. I only made very small "corrections" like this one. I think it's important to work together. Steeve P (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]