Talk:Process window index

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Process window index article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Process window index was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Metalworking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.kicthermal.com/products/pwi-ds.html. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Because this permission was received prior to 1 November 2008, you may use the material under either that license or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009010510014931.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Archives

1

Issues

Just minutes ago I found in this article a passage that read as follows:

${\text{PWI}}=100\times \max _{i=1\dots N \atop j=1\dots M}\left\{\left|{\frac {measured\_value_{[i,j]}-average\_limits_{[i,j]}}{range_{[i,j]}/2}}\right|\right\}$

Where:^[1]

i = 1 to N (number of thermocouples)

j = 1 to M (number of statistics per thermocouple)

measured_value [i,j] = the [i,j]^th statistic's value

average_limits [i,j] = the average of the [i,j]^th high and low limits of the statistic

range [i,j] = the [i,j]^th high limit minus the low limit of the statistic

I changed it to say this:

{\text{PWI}}=100\times \max _{i=1\dots N \atop j=1\dots M}\left\{\left|{\frac {{\text{measured value}}_{[i,j]}-{\text{average limits}}_{[i,j]}}{{\text{range}}_{[i,j]}/2}}\right|\right\}

Where:^[1]

i = 1 to N (number of thermocouples)

j = 1 to M (number of statistics per thermocouple)

measured value [i, j] = the [i, j]^th statistic's value

average limits [i, j] = the average of the [i, j']^th high and low limits of the statistic

range [i, j] = the [i, j]^th high limit minus the low limit of the statistic

One lesson is that whatever it takes to get nominated to be a "Good Article", it doesn't required much attention to standard Wikipedia style conventions. Then I corrected two links in the opening section in which every word began with an incorrectly capitalized initial letter.

So now I'm wondering: why does every word in the title phrase begin with a capital letter? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, thank you for the fixes and article review. The text was in capitals because I had initially thought these were proper nouns – at least in some of the books I have with me, they were. Now that you mention it, I did verify them, and have changed these to lower case. Regards, Zithan (talk) 15:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When I said "the title phrase", I meant the phrase that is the title of the article: Process Window Index. Why do those three words have capital initial letters? Michael Hardy (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. That's what the sources say. Zithan (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference SMT was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[SMT-1] Cite error: The named reference SMT was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]