Talk:Preston Hollow, Dallas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Boundaries

Is there an official source for the boundaries described in this article? The area between Royal and 635, west of Preston or Inwood at least, isn't considered Preston Hollow by anyone I know. This would be the area served by W. T. White HS (as opposed to the Hillcrest HS attendance zone). Using Royal as the northern cutoff would keep Perot's house inside the boundary; don't know about the other famous residents. Lawikitejana 10:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The newest city street signs have little subdivision indicators above them, and they are most definitely all EAST of Preston. Lawikitejana (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Years later, I found reliable sources that describe the boundaries. There are neighborhoods west of Preston that are Preston Hollow too. WhisperToMe (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images in text?

Has it become a standard to have the little images for street and highway signs right there in the text? That's really distracting. Joyous! | Talk 21:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No.. typically only in lists. I think I was just bored.. will remove. -- drumguy8800 C T 22:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Whites Only" Neighborhood?

Seems like a notable mention that within one of the neighborhood's gated communities, existed a covenant should be exclusively white with the exception of servants till 2000. Does the neighborhood have a documented history of racism beyond the elementary school scandal? --65.201.56.133 (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found an article from CBS11 news (a local channel) that talked it, " Until the year 2000, the neighborhood association's covenant said only white people could live there—unless they were servants." http://cbs11tv.com/local/bush.new.house.2.880810.html Cl191 (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how notable it is. Many older neighborhoods across the country carry such restrictions for race, color, religion and/or national origin. The restrictions became moot with the passage of the Equal Housing laws, as I recall. Some neighborhoods have amended their restrictions, but some have not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.46.11.162 (talk) 15:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Preston Hollow, Dallas/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The boundaries need to be clearly defined.. also the only real information beyond generalities is the education thing. There needs to be a history section as well. drumguy8800 C T 09:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 01:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)