Talk:Polypropylene
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polypropylene article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Polypropylene Pipe
[edit]There are pages both for copper pipe and polyethylene pipe, would a new page be merited for polypropylene pipe/tubing? --IanVG (talk) 13:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Polypropylene
[edit]Voice 2402:3A80:1BBB:A381:AA67:F784:E0C1:1B99 (talk) 02:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
UV degradation
[edit]The article has no section on susceptibility to UV radiation. PP rope, in my experience, is not suited to longterm outdoor applications, presumably breaking down by UVB/C. Assuming the black "poly pipe", ubiquitous in Australia, really is PP, its UV resistance must be due to the black filler material, or am I missing something? Doug butler (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Carbon black is a very cost effective means of stabilising plastic against UV but I'm not sure if its used in rope. Fillers like that can effect the machanical properties of the plastic because you usualy need to add quite a bit of them. PP will degrade in sunlight (see: Photo-oxidation of polymers) but there are various UV-stabilisers which can be used to prevent degradation. --Project Osprey (talk) 14:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think I was suggesting adding a filler to rope; just commenting on its poor UV performance, which merits a sentence or two. Thanks for the link. I thought my chemistry knowledge was OK but what are "reactive oxygen species"? Ozone? Nascent atoms? Doug butler (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Ah — I just found Singlet oxygen. — I'm now know a little more. Isn't WP wonderful! Doug butler (talk) 21:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's free radical chemistry, which can be confusing even to trained chemists. In this context reactive oxygen species include a few different compounds: peroxy radical (ROO•), which are the most reactive - but also hydroperoxides (ROOH, not to be confused with carboxylic acids) and alkoxy radicals (RO•). I keep meaning to improve these pages but it's a big job and I lack the time. Project Osprey (talk) 09:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think I was suggesting adding a filler to rope; just commenting on its poor UV performance, which merits a sentence or two. Thanks for the link. I thought my chemistry knowledge was OK but what are "reactive oxygen species"? Ozone? Nascent atoms? Doug butler (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Ah — I just found Singlet oxygen. — I'm now know a little more. Isn't WP wonderful! Doug butler (talk) 21:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Recycling section is really bad...
[edit]The recycling section looks like it was written by an eighth grader. Poor grammar, factually incorrect, and cites greenwashing on a plastic packaging company's website. I don't have the time or energy to research and correct it. Salix~Willow (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class chemicals articles
- High-importance chemicals articles
- B-Class WPChem worklist articles