Jump to content

Talk:Copyright law of the Philippines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Someone should update Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Licensing. --evrik (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States copyright law which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 12:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Government copyright -- apparent error in article

[edit]

This edit elsewhere caught my eye, and sent me here. I see that the Government copyright section says that Sec. 176 of RA8293 says that the exemption of governmental works from copyright protection is limited to works of "legislative, administrative, or judicial nature ...". This appears to be an error. Those quoted words are contained in Sec. 175, Unprotected Subject Matter, under CHAPTER IV, WORKS NOT PROTECTED. Section 176, Works of the Government, says, "No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government of the Philippines. ...". Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Wtmitchell it is a contentious matter for Wikipedians. Commons already accepts this as a public domain license but enwiki still treats the non-commercial restriction as not meeting the Definition of Free Cultural Works and is a fair use-able content.
No copyright subsists and is indeed a fact, but a prior-permission condition exists if the works are to be exploited commercially. No permission is needed for personal, private study, research et cetera.
This has to be addressed next, after the introduction of FOP in the Philippines. I can see more government websites with "all rights reserved" copyright statement, like Senate, PNA (current consensus states PNA content is no longer acceptable there, unless the source is freely-licensed), and various LGU websites, like that of Pangasinan province.
I am aware that this may not be the appropriate forum for such topic. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article 176 - what is "government"?

[edit]

Is government restricted to national government, or is it every administrative body? For instance, do I need approval from my local municipality before I can incorporate its seal etc? John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Thu 13:15, wikitime= 05:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copyright law of the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Copyright_law_of_the_Philippines&oldid=1231417871"