Talk:Pakistan Aeronautical Complex

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Untitled

I don't think Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) built the F-16; C-130; Mirage F-5; Mirage 2000 or the Atlantique as shown in the entry for Pakistan. Perhaps the person responsible for this meant the Complex has carried out major overhauls and perhaps rebuilt the aircraft .

It did not build the F-16, C-130, or Mirage 2000, but it did produce under license Mirage-5, C-130 and Mirage 2000. It also does build Atlantiques under license

So an Aircraft manufacturer, but not an Aircraft engine manufacturer, though does service engines! Hugo999 (talk) 01:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/news62591.html
Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pakistan Aeronautical Complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pakistan Aeronautical Complex/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

PAC has never license built Mirages, Atlantiques or C130. It has rebuilt Mirage III and V, including for UAE, rebuilt or extensive service of Atlantique, but that may have been in facilities in Karachi under Pak Navy, along with servicing for the Sea Kings in PN service. The Alluettes were never produced or license built in Pakistan. As for the F-16 and the C-130, only their engines were serviced, and I think the C-130 engines were serviced by PIA's facilities in Karachi.

Last edited at 02:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 02:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Project Azm

The page seems to be an initiative by the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex. Little is known about this project and has largely a single source(multiple news articles from the same government press release). It makes better sense for this to be a part of the other article until more is known about the project. Adamgerber80 (talk) 01:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The news source suggests that the MALE UAV part of the project is in final stages and there for images and more information is likely to be released soon. I would suggest keeping the article. Shiraz.s10 (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2017 (BST)

Shiraz.s10 Neither of those are valid reasons to keep this page. A new page with the relevant name for the MALE drone can be created when more information is released. Till then it makes more sense to merge this under this article for better organization and relevance. Adamgerber80 (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Project Azm includes many ongoing projects, why should it be merged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.121.171 (talk)

Support - not enough content to justify a separate article at this time. Separate articles on each aircraft can be created when enough information is available to do so. - BilCat (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As of 2020 enough information is available and i managed to convert the redirect into a 13,000 bytes article however my edits got reverted because i failed to summarize and instead paraphrased in one section, @BilCat:, @Adamgerber80: and @Shiraz.s10: do you all agree with me turning it into a new articleسب سے بڑی گڑبڑ^(talk) 08:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]