Talk:Vanessa cardui

Importance rating

As a well-known species, both in the wild (globally) and in captivity, this species warrants High importance—GRM (talk) 15:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Range Map

It would be interesting to see a map showing the range on various continents. 206.53.196.209 (talk) 01:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

No—"Painted Lady" is too ambiguous. Go back through the history and you'll see that they were once one page, and we split them...—GRM (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re proposed merge of Painted Lady into Vanessa cardui: not synonymous topics (one is subset of other). I removed merge tags. ENeville (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If one is a subset of the other, that seems to justify the merger. Robert The Rebuilder (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mine was a hasty and poorly stated comment. I think that having a separate article for a species (Vanessa cardui) is useful and conventional. The article at Painted Lady is about a group (subgenus), including three other species [1][2][3], which also have their own articles. It would seem that if the topic of one species should be merged into that of the group, then so too should the other three's, but that would be unexpected and not in the service of learning. That's my thinking, anyway.

I could see a case for moving Vanessa cardui to Painted Lady, and moving the topic of the subgenus to Cynthia (subgenus) (or some such), since the other Painted Lady butterflies are listed by common name and probably most people entering "Painted Lady" are looking for the species, not the somewhat esoteric topic of the subgenus. ENeville (talk) 01:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2013. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Washington University in St. Louis/Behavioral Ecology (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Section of behavior, particularly in terms of breeding in relation to migration, was added. Ichooxu (talk) 21:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Painted lady

I never heard it called cosmopolitan in the United States. It is painted lady, nothing else, as this website shows Red Admiral and Painted Lady Research Site. How about changing that? --Polinizador (talk) 19:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Additions?

As part of a course on Behavioral Ecology, I have been assigned to look at some Lepidoptera pages and comment on what might be worth adding. A few suggestions I had: I thought the article could have benefited from a more detailed look at its defense interactions, which was only minimally mentioned even though they have unique defense mechanisms during different parts of its life cycle. Another area that could be more established concerns its human interactions. Is there more information on why these butterflies are commonly bred for human release, perhaps because of their orange color (similarity to monarchs)? --Engelde (talk) 14 Sept. 2017

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vanessa cardui. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022154913/http://butterfly-conservation.org/Butterfly/32/Butterfly.html?ButterflyId=38 to http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/butterfly/32/butterfly.html?butterflyid=38

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Egg size indication

Could the size of the egg be given? The photograph gives no indication and the information would be of interest to amateur naturalists keen on conservation.

Franciscus montmartinensis (talk) 09:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]