This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the October 1992 Turkish attack on Hakurk Camp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

It is requested that an image or photograph of October 1992 Turkish attack on Hakurk Camp be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comments

Casualties

I see a Turkish source talking about casualties. Well that should be pointed out who declared them, as they could be work of propaganda (usual phenomenon in military conflicts). See example box in 2006 Lebanon War about Hezb Allah victims --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they have multiple contradicting sources there. As long as there is no dispute on numbers, I don't think we should show it as if there were disputes. What you did was adding OR, imo. Also a government's statement is quite reliable in real life and here (politician's opinion not necessarily), but it might a primary source, so we might need to be careful. We have too many "Turkey announced"s, as well. Deniz^T_C 13:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as long as only one side gives such info on the other, it should be noted for NPOV's sake. Well, the Turkish losses are self-disclosed they don't need such notification. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV does not dictate us to create opposing views. If something is not opposed, then it is not opposed. Also, like I said before, "Turkey announced"s are used excessively. Deniz^T_C 16:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the sources? ? ? Please translate them too. I would like to also see other sources because one source may be biased (129.21.71.50 (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Not the way I would have expected it

I know Saddam Hussein's government was relentless with enemies. How could they have just let the Turks march in? I know they haten the Kurds, but would'nt they do something about foreign troops on their own soil without their permission? Its just not like Saddam. Reenem (talk)

File:Tak Flag.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Tak Flag.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tak Flag.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]