Talk:Oil, Gas and Energy Law

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oil, Gas and Energy Law article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Type of publication?

It's not clear to me how best to categorize this hybrid, online publication. It appears to primarily be an online newsletter, but does include some peer-reviewed scholarly articles. According to the publication's website, they "are looking mainly for short comments on recent developments of broad interest." It thus seems to fit best into Category:Environmental websites and Category:Environmental magazines. Other thoughts and suggestions? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Type of publication?

OGEL is just a law journal, as we publish online we also added a few other services such as legal & regulatory database which includes energy related laws. We are certainly not an environmental journal and do not publish a newsletter. Here is an example of a paper on SSRN http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1740090 Most of the articles we publish are standard law journal articles, there is a small percentage of shorter (op-ed) comments and columns which are not peer reviewed, the law articles are. If you require further information please write to info@ogel.org so we can further information. Thank you. edit: The confusion might come from this page http://www.ogel.org/contribute.asp which may indeed cause confusion - a new version will be posted in the next couple of days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariswp (talk • contribs) 13:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this further information. Once the website is updated, that may indeed help clarify the focus of the publication. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The http://www.ogel.org/contribute.asp page has been updated. Do let me know if require further info. I would like to set back the Infobox back to journal type and not magazine. Mariswp (talk) 11:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moving target

Seems to be a rather moving target. Consulting both the official journal website and WorldCat, I have tried to update this article accordingly. Part of the confusion frankly lies in the website: there's the website, the journal, and related publications. There are not always clear distinctions between them, and the names for each are inconsistent. This may need further tweaking in the future if and as this information becomes more refined. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article development

I note the article is marked as a stub - would an overview of the special features be useful to add - a list similar to this page http://www.ogel.org/specialfeatures.asp (without the intros but only the titles of the specials) Mariswp (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide for Wikipedia's guidelines for articles on academic journals. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Oil, Gas and Energy Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/main/html/News/ogelannounce.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]